Tournament presence · pick + ban
18.6%#32 of 173 champions
Pick
7.0%picked in 1,968 of 28,306 games
Ban
11.6%2,648 bans over 22,884 games, against 4.2% in soloQ
Win rate as Jungle47.7% between 45.8% and 49.6% over 1,944 gamesSoloQ 47.1%: no clear gap
Median length29.3 minsoloQ 27.8 min

Amateur: 29,650 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 64% · EUW 26% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 963,871 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Jungle.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    3.0%
    SoloQ
    1.2%
    3.0% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.2% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    9.8%
    SoloQ
    4.2%
    9.8% ban rate in amateur play over 15,385 games, against 4.2% in soloQ over 431,272 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.3 min
    SoloQ
    27.8 min
    Median of 29.3 min in amateur play, against 27.8 min in soloQ.
  • BuildExperimental Hexplate, Stridebreaker, Guardian Angel instead of Profane Hydra, Axiom Arc, Voltaic Cyclosword
    Amateur
    19%
    SoloQ
    16%
    Played in 19% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Profane Hydra, Axiom Arc, Voltaic Cyclosword (16%).
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Conqueror, then Profane Hydra, Axiom Arc, and Voltaic Cyclosword: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesConqueror43% · 10,253
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Smite99% · 23,721
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 352 games
Core (3 legendaries)16% · 1,952
16%of soloQ games
  1. Profane Hydra
  2. Axiom Arc
  3. Voltaic Cyclosword
≠ Amateur: Experimental Hexplate, Stridebreaker, Guardian Angel instead of Profane Hydra, Axiom Arc, Voltaic Cyclosword. 19% · 1,232 games

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 100% of junglers.

  1. Crowd control (CC)top1%5.5 · junglers: 0.7

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other junglers

What marks it

  • CC

Like other junglers

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Map pressure
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Team damage
  • Jungle farm

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 36 in lane, 31 in mid game and 26 in late game, out of 100 junglers.

364-19 vs 383
752-44 vs 796
944-112 vs 1,056
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Nocturnejunglers

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 72% of junglers against the direct opponent.

junglers
4.8takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; junglers: 4.7.

Where it stands among junglers · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 36 of 100 among junglers364 · median 383
  • Damage in mid game · rank 31 of 100 among junglers752 · median 796
  • Damage in late game · rank 26 of 100 among junglers944 · median 1,056
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 33 of 100 among junglers-87 · median +6
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 28 of 100 among junglers-218 · median +64
  • Map pressure · rank 56 of 100 among junglers4.8 · median 4.7
  • Absorbs damage · rank 44 of 100 among junglers751 · median 855
  • Plays teamfights · rank 47 of 100 among junglers52% · median 52%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 53 of 100 among junglers20% · median 20%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 80 of 100 among junglersrank 80 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 100 of 100 among junglers5.5 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 41 of 100 among junglers16% · median 17%
  • Jungle farm · rank 69 of 100 among junglers68 · median 66
  • Invade · rank 24 of 100 among junglers6% · median 7%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Cho'Gath in amateur play: +18.6 pts over 57 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Yone60.4% · expected 47.7% · 48 g+12.7 ptSoloQ -2.4
Sion55.9% · expected 48.1% · 102 g+7.7 ptSoloQ -3.8
Mordekaiser50.9% · expected 46.9% · 55 g+4.0 ptSoloQ -3.3
Ornn47.4% · expected 47.3% · 95 g+0.1 ptSoloQ +2.0
Camille47.2% · expected 45.0% · 53 g+2.2 ptSoloQ +1.3
Junglegap to expected
Cho'Gath64.9% · expected 46.4% · 57 g+18.6 ptSoloQ +1.2
Viego56.9% · expected 48.7% · 58 g+8.2 ptSoloQ +1.7
Graves57.1% · expected 47.8% · 35 g+9.4 ptSoloQ -2.2
Lee Sin50.4% · expected 47.9% · 141 g+2.4 ptSoloQ -1.0
Sylas50.0% · expected 46.9% · 82 g+3.1 ptSoloQ -0.6
Midgap to expected
Locke64.9% · expected 47.9% · 74 g+17.0 ptSoloQ -4.6
Viktor52.1% · expected 47.1% · 140 g+5.1 ptSoloQ 0.0
LeBlanc56.9% · expected 47.4% · 51 g+9.4 ptSoloQ +1.0
Lissandra54.2% · expected 48.9% · 72 g+5.3 ptSoloQ +2.3
Orianna51.3% · expected 49.7% · 150 g+1.7 ptSoloQ +0.9
ADCgap to expected
Jinx57.0% · expected 45.9% · 107 g+11.1 ptSoloQ +4.1
Tristana52.5% · expected 48.0% · 99 g+4.6 ptSoloQ +1.8
Caitlyn47.5% · expected 45.6% · 141 g+1.9 ptSoloQ +1.4
Miss Fortune53.7% · expected 48.5% · 41 g+5.2 ptSoloQ +4.7
Supportgap to expected
Nautilus51.4% · expected 47.6% · 177 g+3.8 ptSoloQ -0.8
Lulu51.8% · expected 50.0% · 193 g+1.8 ptSoloQ -2.5
Blitzcrank51.4% · expected 45.9% · 70 g+5.5 ptSoloQ +3.8
Leona50.9% · expected 48.8% · 112 g+2.1 ptSoloQ -0.5
Braum47.7% · expected 46.2% · 111 g+1.5 ptSoloQ +0.2

With

Topgap to expected
Aatrox58.2% · expected 48.5% · 67 g+9.8 ptSoloQ +1.7
K'Sante50.0% · expected 45.6% · 88 g+4.4 ptSoloQ +0.2
Shen50.0% · expected 44.9% · 70 g+5.1 ptSoloQ +1.7
Camille53.4% · expected 50.4% · 88 g+3.0 ptSoloQ +0.9
Ambessa50.5% · expected 48.3% · 99 g+2.2 ptSoloQ +0.9
Midgap to expected
Sylas56.5% · expected 47.4% · 85 g+9.1 ptSoloQ -0.4
Yone62.5% · expected 50.6% · 32 g+11.9 ptSoloQ -1.8
Syndra53.9% · expected 48.6% · 115 g+5.3 ptSoloQ -0.3
Orianna46.0% · expected 45.7% · 309 g+0.2 ptSoloQ +1.5
Locke53.3% · expected 47.5% · 60 g+5.8 ptSoloQ +1.5
ADCgap to expected
Xayah55.8% · expected 48.8% · 104 g+7.0 ptSoloQ -0.6
Caitlyn53.9% · expected 49.8% · 152 g+4.2 ptSoloQ +1.1
Aphelios50.0% · expected 43.7% · 64 g+6.3 ptSoloQ -0.6
Yunara52.0% · expected 49.8% · 177 g+2.2 ptSoloQ +0.8
Jinx53.3% · expected 49.5% · 105 g+3.8 ptSoloQ -1.5
Supportgap to expected
Karma51.7% · expected 45.3% · 89 g+6.4 ptSoloQ -1.3
Blitzcrank53.9% · expected 49.5% · 76 g+4.5 ptSoloQ +1.3
Lulu46.5% · expected 45.4% · 185 g+1.1 ptSoloQ +1.4
Rakan50.4% · expected 48.4% · 115 g+2.0 ptSoloQ -3.2
Braum50.5% · expected 49.2% · 103 g+1.3 ptSoloQ +0.9

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top27 champions
  • Sion102 games
    55.9%gap +7.7 ptsSoloQ: 43.8% · 425 g
  • Ornn95 games
    47.4%gap +0.1 ptsSoloQ: 48.3% · 495 g
  • K'Sante92 games
    48.9%gap -0.9 ptsSoloQ: 46.4% · 560 g
  • Renekton90 games
    41.1%gap -4.8 ptsSoloQ: 47.3% · 675 g
  • Malphite88 games
    47.7%gap -0.5 ptsSoloQ: 48.2% · 812 g
Jungle23 champions
  • Wukong212 games
    43.4%gap -2.1 ptsSoloQ: 44.9% · 908 g
  • Jarvan IV169 games
    43.2%gap -5.9 ptsSoloQ: 47.4% · 909 g
  • Lee Sin141 games
    50.4%gap +2.4 ptsSoloQ: 46.4% · 1,604 g
  • Vi136 games
    44.9%gap -2.5 ptsSoloQ: 48.5% · 503 g
  • Xin Zhao125 games
    44.0%gap -3.7 ptsSoloQ: 49.0% · 351 g
Mid20 champions
  • Ahri151 games
    41.1%gap -4.8 ptsSoloQ: 45.6% · 1,262 g
  • Orianna150 games
    51.3%gap +1.7 ptsSoloQ: 49.9% · 499 g
  • Viktor140 games
    52.1%gap +5.1 ptsSoloQ: 48.2% · 1,086 g
  • Syndra132 games
    42.4%gap -4.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.7% · 982 g
  • Akali75 games
    46.7%gap -0.4 ptsSoloQ: 44.4% · 771 g
ADC18 champions
  • Yunara188 games
    44.1%gap -1.5 ptsSoloQ: 47.5% · 1,722 g
  • Xayah177 games
    41.8%gap -4.8 ptsSoloQ: 44.1% · 958 g
  • Ezreal176 games
    46.0%gap -5.2 ptsSoloQ: 49.6% · 1,397 g
  • Kai'Sa150 games
    46.0%gap -2.0 ptsSoloQ: 46.5% · 2,098 g
  • Caitlyn141 games
    47.5%gap +1.9 ptsSoloQ: 49.8% · 1,270 g
Support18 champions
  • Lulu193 games
    51.8%gap +1.8 ptsSoloQ: 44.6% · 1,728 g
  • Nautilus177 games
    51.4%gap +3.8 ptsSoloQ: 47.1% · 1,290 g
  • Rakan126 games
    41.3%gap -5.7 ptsSoloQ: 47.8% · 715 g
  • Thresh126 games
    46.0%gap -0.2 ptsSoloQ: 46.4% · 1,751 g
  • Seraphine115 games
    44.3%gap -2.5 ptsSoloQ: 48.4% · 626 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Jungle

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.2%23,360 picks of 1,927,733ban 4.2% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments3.0%1,210 picks of 40,028ban 9.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro5.8%129 picks of 2,238bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

17.1% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Jungle
  • 7.2%G1522 games of 7,222
  • 7.5%G2541 games of 7,225
  • 8.0%G3+232 games of 2,887
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 522 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.