Tournament presence · pick + ban
14.4%#54 of 173 champions
Pick
7.2%picked in 2,104 of 29,354 games
Ban
7.2%1,706 bans over 23,568 games, against 2.8% in soloQ
Win rate as Top52.7% between 50.7% and 54.7% over 1,675 gamesSoloQ 51.6%: no clear gap
Median length29 minsoloQ 27.1 min

Amateur: 29,650 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 64% · EUW 26% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 993,798 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    7.3%
    SoloQ
    2.8%
    7.3% ban rate in amateur play over 16,135 games, against 2.8% in soloQ over 472,978 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29 min
    SoloQ
    27.1 min
    Median of 29 min in amateur play, against 27.1 min in soloQ.
  • SpellsFlash + Teleport instead of Flash + Ignite
    Amateur
    48%
    SoloQ
    57%
    Played in 48% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Flash + Ignite (57%).
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Grasp of the Undying, then Trinity Force, Ravenous Hydra, and Death's Dance: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesGrasp of the Undying81% · 45,091
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite57% · 31,419
≠ Amateur: Flash + Teleport instead of Flash + Ignite. 48% · 1,882 games
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 437 games
Core (3 legendaries)45% · 9,366
45%of soloQ games
  1. Trinity Force
  2. Ravenous Hydra
  3. Death's Dance
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Team damage first: more damage than 88% of top laners.

  1. Team damagetop12%25% · top laners: 20%
  2. Takes its kills in duelstop25%31% · top laners: 28%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

  • Duelist
  • Damage
  • Split-push

Like other top laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Crowd control (CC)

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 65 in lane, 89 in mid game and 60 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

629+30 vs 599
970+102 vs 868
1,110+30 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Camilletop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 71% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 65 of 100 among top laners629 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 89 of 100 among top laners970 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 60 of 100 among top laners1,110 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 53 of 100 among top laners+121 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 71 of 100 among top laners+353 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 67 of 100 among top laners1,129 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 27 of 100 among top laners51% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 75 of 100 among top laners31% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 24 of 100 among top lanersrank 24 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 51 of 100 among top laners0.8 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 88 of 100 among top laners25% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Bard in amateur play: +16.7 pts over 48 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Poppy65.7% · expected 52.1% · 35 g+13.6 ptSoloQ -1.9
Zaahen60.0% · expected 50.4% · 45 g+9.6 ptSoloQ +0.9
Gragas64.9% · expected 55.3% · 37 g+9.6 ptSoloQ 0.0
Ornn54.7% · expected 52.2% · 170 g+2.5 ptSoloQ +0.7
Garen64.7% · expected 55.4% · 34 g+9.3 ptSoloQ +4.7
Junglegap to expected
Lillia64.7% · expected 49.0% · 51 g+15.7 ptSoloQ -0.8
Jarvan IV61.2% · expected 54.2% · 139 g+6.9 ptSoloQ -1.9
Graves63.6% · expected 52.3% · 33 g+11.3 ptSoloQ +1.7
Cho'Gath60.5% · expected 51.4% · 43 g+9.1 ptSoloQ -1.5
Viego61.7% · expected 53.9% · 47 g+7.8 ptSoloQ -1.9
Midgap to expected
Ahri56.7% · expected 51.0% · 127 g+5.7 ptSoloQ +1.4
LeBlanc58.5% · expected 52.1% · 53 g+6.4 ptSoloQ +1.3
Galio62.9% · expected 54.3% · 35 g+8.6 ptSoloQ -0.8
Orianna56.2% · expected 54.4% · 105 g+1.8 ptSoloQ +1.5
Sylas56.5% · expected 53.1% · 69 g+3.4 ptSoloQ +0.7
ADCgap to expected
Caitlyn58.1% · expected 50.9% · 124 g+7.1 ptSoloQ +1.0
Zeri56.3% · expected 49.1% · 71 g+7.2 ptSoloQ +2.0
Ashe56.7% · expected 51.3% · 90 g+5.4 ptSoloQ -1.0
Aphelios62.1% · expected 56.4% · 66 g+5.7 ptSoloQ 0.0
Jinx51.4% · expected 51.1% · 111 g+0.2 ptSoloQ -0.5
Supportgap to expected
Bard66.7% · expected 50.0% · 48 g+16.7 ptSoloQ -0.1
Karma61.1% · expected 54.9% · 90 g+6.2 ptSoloQ +0.1
Nautilus54.9% · expected 52.7% · 142 g+2.2 ptSoloQ -1.7
Milio57.6% · expected 54.5% · 99 g+3.1 ptSoloQ -0.4
Neeko57.9% · expected 51.2% · 38 g+6.6 ptSoloQ -0.3

With

Junglegap to expected
Wukong62.2% · expected 55.0% · 172 g+7.2 ptSoloQ -0.9
Jarvan IV53.6% · expected 51.2% · 138 g+2.4 ptSoloQ -2.0
Nocturne53.8% · expected 50.5% · 91 g+3.4 ptSoloQ +1.2
Lee Sin53.7% · expected 52.6% · 123 g+1.0 ptSoloQ 0.0
Skarner53.3% · expected 50.8% · 45 g+2.6 ptSoloQ -1.9
Midgap to expected
Aurora67.2% · expected 51.8% · 58 g+15.5 ptSoloQ +0.4
Orianna58.6% · expected 51.0% · 116 g+7.6 ptSoloQ +0.1
Sylas58.3% · expected 52.3% · 72 g+6.0 ptSoloQ +2.5
Viktor55.8% · expected 53.5% · 129 g+2.3 ptSoloQ +2.8
Twisted Fate60.5% · expected 53.8% · 38 g+6.7 ptSoloQ -0.2
ADCgap to expected
Miss Fortune61.3% · expected 51.5% · 62 g+9.7 ptSoloQ -1.3
Ashe61.7% · expected 54.2% · 94 g+7.5 ptSoloQ -0.2
Yunara57.7% · expected 54.9% · 175 g+2.8 ptSoloQ -0.4
Kai'Sa54.8% · expected 52.2% · 126 g+2.6 ptSoloQ -1.9
Aphelios52.7% · expected 49.0% · 55 g+3.8 ptSoloQ -1.6
Supportgap to expected
Bard69.2% · expected 55.4% · 39 g+13.8 ptSoloQ +0.7
Milio58.4% · expected 50.9% · 89 g+7.5 ptSoloQ +1.3
Seraphine58.5% · expected 53.4% · 106 g+5.0 ptSoloQ +0.8
Lulu53.2% · expected 50.6% · 171 g+2.6 ptSoloQ +0.3
Thresh59.5% · expected 54.2% · 74 g+5.3 ptSoloQ -0.9

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top24 champions
  • Ornn170 games
    54.7%gap +2.5 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 1,418 g
  • Ambessa119 games
    54.6%gap +2.7 ptsSoloQ: 54.7% · 2,031 g
  • K'Sante90 games
    52.2%gap -2.7 ptsSoloQ: 55.5% · 1,289 g
  • Renekton86 games
    48.8%gap -2.1 ptsSoloQ: 51.0% · 2,364 g
  • Jax78 games
    47.4%gap -4.9 ptsSoloQ: 48.4% · 2,279 g
Jungle22 champions
  • Wukong156 games
    51.9%gap +1.5 ptsSoloQ: 49.4% · 1,855 g
  • Jarvan IV139 games
    61.2%gap +6.9 ptsSoloQ: 50.6% · 2,137 g
  • Lee Sin125 games
    52.8%gap 0.0 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 3,871 g
  • Vi117 games
    49.6%gap -2.8 ptsSoloQ: 51.9% · 1,157 g
  • Xin Zhao77 games
    48.1%gap -4.4 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 809 g
Mid20 champions
  • Ahri127 games
    56.7%gap +5.7 ptsSoloQ: 52.0% · 2,625 g
  • Syndra119 games
    49.6%gap -1.9 ptsSoloQ: 52.6% · 2,583 g
  • Viktor114 games
    50.0%gap -2.0 ptsSoloQ: 52.0% · 2,517 g
  • Orianna105 games
    56.2%gap +1.8 ptsSoloQ: 54.8% · 1,153 g
  • Locke71 games
    45.1%gap -8.0 ptsSoloQ: 51.7% · 2,445 g
ADC17 champions
  • Yunara166 games
    48.2%gap -2.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 4,083 g
  • Kai'Sa134 games
    53.0%gap -0.3 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 4,564 g
  • Ezreal126 games
    54.8%gap -1.5 ptsSoloQ: 56.2% · 3,253 g
  • Caitlyn124 games
    58.1%gap +7.1 ptsSoloQ: 53.9% · 2,929 g
  • Jinx111 games
    51.4%gap +0.2 ptsSoloQ: 49.6% · 3,450 g
Support18 champions
  • Lulu153 games
    50.3%gap -4.5 ptsSoloQ: 51.0% · 3,801 g
  • Nautilus142 games
    54.9%gap +2.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.7% · 3,313 g
  • Braum121 games
    49.6%gap -1.7 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 1,758 g
  • Leona101 games
    54.5%gap +0.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 2,281 g
  • Milio99 games
    57.6%gap +3.1 ptsSoloQ: 52.9% · 1,439 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+2.8%55,579 picks of 1,987,578ban 2.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments2.9%1,232 picks of 42,302ban 7.3% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro5.2%116 picks of 2,238bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

16.5% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
  • 5.6%G1421 games of 7,554
  • 6.3%G2479 games of 7,554
  • 6.7%G3+202 games of 3,018
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 421 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.