Champion sheet · Support

Nami

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · KR

Tournament presence · pick + ban

2.2%#153 of 173 champions

Pick: 1.8%picked in 339 of 18,494 games
Ban: 0.4%67 bans over 17,510 games, against 0.1% in soloQ

Win rate as Support46.6% between 42.2% and 51.1% over 339 gamesSoloQ 48.6%: no clear gap

Median length29.1 minsoloQ 26.4 min

Amateur: 18,750 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 348,503 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments2 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Support.DraftLength
How to play itSummon Aery: the most played keystone in soloQ, the core is still to be measured.
In a compLets allies carry kills first: lets allies carry more than 81% of supports.TeamfightLets allies carry
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftFallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

2 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Support.

DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
0.5%
SoloQ
0.1%
0.5% ban rate in amateur play over 12,177 games, against 0.1% in soloQ over 162,170 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
29.1 min
SoloQ
26.4 min
Median of 29.1 min in amateur play, against 26.4 min in soloQ.

Not enough games to judge: core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Summon Aery: the most played keystone in soloQ, the core is still to be measured.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesSummon Aery98% · 5,145

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Heal93% · 4,892

Same in amateur play

SkillsWnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 97% · 60 games

Core (3 legendaries)

No choice measured.

SoloQ core not measured: too few games with items read.

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Lets allies carry kills first: lets allies carry more than 81% of supports.

Lets allies carry killstop19%rank 81 of 100
Plays teamfightstop22%57% · supports: 54%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other supports

What marks it

Teamfight
Lets allies carry

Like other supports

Damage in late game
Crowd control (CC)
Team damage

What it is not

Little map pressure
Few duels
No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 23 in lane, 25 in mid game and 37 in late game, out of 100 supports.

227-61 vs 288

274-68 vs 342

353-35 vs 388

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Namisupports

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 81% of supports against the direct opponent.

supports

4.1takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; supports: 4.5.

Where it stands among supports · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 23 of 100 among supports227 · median 288
Damage in mid game · rank 25 of 100 among supports274 · median 342
Damage in late game · rank 37 of 100 among supports353 · median 388
Gold at 15 min · rank 17 of 100 among supports-95 · median +105
Gold at 20 min · rank 19 of 100 among supports-133 · median +193
Map pressure · rank 25 of 100 among supports4.1 · median 4.5
Absorbs damage · rank 20 of 100 among supports246 · median 393
Plays teamfights · rank 78 of 100 among supports57% · median 54%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 10 of 100 among supports13% · median 17%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 81 of 100 among supportsrank 81 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 48 of 100 among supports1 · median 1
Team damage · rank 34 of 100 among supports8% · median 9%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Wukong45.2% · expected 42.0% · 31 g+3.1 ptSoloQ -0.4

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

Caitlyn44.4% · expected 44.3% · 36 g+0.1 ptSoloQ -0.9

Supportgap to expected

Milio51.2% · expected 47.7% · 43 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +2.1

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Jarvan IV59.4% · expected 44.4% · 32 g+15.0 ptSoloQ -0.5

Lee Sin51.3% · expected 45.4% · 39 g+5.9 ptSoloQ -3.9

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

Corki48.7% · expected 46.0% · 78 g+2.8 ptSoloQ +3.8

Caitlyn50.0% · expected 48.9% · 32 g+1.1 ptSoloQ +3.4

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top18 champions