Champion sheet · Support

Nautilus

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · EUW

Tournament presence · pick + ban

37.5%#6 of 173 champions

Pick: 18.6%picked in 1,337 of 7,199 games
Ban: 18.9%673 bans over 3,555 games, against 13.3% in soloQ

Win rate as Support53.4% between 51.1% and 55.7% over 1,322 gamesSoloQ 49.2%: clear gap

Median length28.6 minsoloQ 27.4 min

Amateur: 7,611 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 376,433 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Support.Win rateDraftLength
How to play itAftershock, then Protoplasm Harness, Kaenic Rookern, and Frozen Heart: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compAbsorbs damage first: absorbs more than 97% of supports.FrontlineTeamfightCC
With / againstBetter than expected against Lissandra in amateur play: +16.2 pts over 38 games, range above zero.+16.2 pt38 games
In draftTaken at any point of the series.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Support.

Win rateWins more in amateur play
Amateur
53.4%
SoloQ
49.2%
53.4% win rate in amateur play over 1,322 games, against 49.2% in soloQ over 43,229 games.
DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
9.5%
SoloQ
5.7%
9.5% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 5.7% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
18.7%
SoloQ
13.3%
18.7% ban rate in amateur play over 2,247 games, against 13.3% in soloQ over 169,540 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
28.6 min
SoloQ
27.4 min
Median of 28.6 min in amateur play, against 27.4 min in soloQ.

Not enough games to judge: core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Aftershock, then Protoplasm Harness, Kaenic Rookern, and Frozen Heart: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesAftershock91% · 39,356

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Ignite62% · 26,976

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 94% · 291 games

Core (3 legendaries)6% · 2

6%of soloQ games

Protoplasm Harness
Kaenic Rookern
Frozen Heart

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Absorbs damage first: absorbs more than 97% of supports.

Absorbs damagetop3%1,114 · supports: 393
Crowd control (CC)top3%1.9 · supports: 1
Plays teamfightstop12%57% · supports: 54%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other supports

What marks it

Frontline
Teamfight
CC

Like other supports

Damage in lane
Damage in mid game
Damage in late game
Map pressure
Takes its kills in duels
Lets allies carry kills
Team damage

What it is not

No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 42 in lane, 30 in mid game and 27 in late game, out of 100 supports.

255-33 vs 288

287-55 vs 342

317-71 vs 388

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Nautilussupports

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 85% of supports against the direct opponent.

supports

4.9takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; supports: 4.5.

Where it stands among supports · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 42 of 100 among supports255 · median 288
Damage in mid game · rank 30 of 100 among supports287 · median 342
Damage in late game · rank 27 of 100 among supports317 · median 388
Gold at 15 min · rank 24 of 100 among supports-80 · median +105
Gold at 20 min · rank 15 of 100 among supports-143 · median +193
Map pressure · rank 68 of 100 among supports4.9 · median 4.5
Absorbs damage · rank 97 of 100 among supports1,114 · median 393
Plays teamfights · rank 88 of 100 among supports57% · median 54%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 34 of 100 among supports15% · median 17%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 45 of 100 among supportsrank 45 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 97 of 100 among supports1.9 · median 1
Team damage · rank 32 of 100 among supports8% · median 9%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Lissandra in amateur play: +16.2 pts over 38 games, range above zero.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

Ambessa62.3% · expected 52.9% · 69 g+9.4 ptSoloQ -1.3

Malphite71.4% · expected 60.4% · 42 g+11.0 ptSoloQ +0.2

Ornn57.0% · expected 54.6% · 142 g+2.4 ptSoloQ -0.7

Camille57.1% · expected 47.8% · 35 g+9.3 ptSoloQ +1.7

Sion55.9% · expected 52.6% · 59 g+3.3 ptSoloQ -1.7

Junglegap to expected

Jarvan IV64.4% · expected 53.9% · 118 g+10.5 ptSoloQ -3.5

Sejuani63.8% · expected 58.7% · 47 g+5.1 ptSoloQ +0.9

Vi54.1% · expected 52.7% · 74 g+1.3 ptSoloQ +2.8

Trundle54.1% · expected 49.9% · 37 g+4.2 ptSoloQ +0.5

Qiyana43.6% · expected 42.4% · 39 g+1.2 ptSoloQ +1.7

Midgap to expected

Lissandra68.4% · expected 52.3% · 38 g+16.2 ptSoloQ -0.7

Ryze55.9% · expected 53.0% · 34 g+2.9 ptSoloQ -1.5

Galio58.3% · expected 58.0% · 36 g+0.3 ptSoloQ +1.6

ADCgap to expected

Jinx62.1% · expected 55.5% · 95 g+6.6 ptSoloQ -1.2

Ashe61.2% · expected 55.7% · 85 g+5.5 ptSoloQ -1.2

Lucian60.3% · expected 54.7% · 73 g+5.5 ptSoloQ +3.2

Jhin57.6% · expected 51.7% · 66 g+5.9 ptSoloQ +0.9

Ezreal59.6% · expected 55.4% · 89 g+4.1 ptSoloQ +0.3

Supportgap to expected

Seraphine64.7% · expected 55.3% · 85 g+9.4 ptSoloQ -3.8

Karma61.6% · expected 55.2% · 73 g+6.4 ptSoloQ +2.5

Lulu58.4% · expected 56.0% · 173 g+2.4 ptSoloQ +1.3

Milio57.0% · expected 54.8% · 93 g+2.2 ptSoloQ +0.2

Thresh53.4% · expected 51.8% · 73 g+1.6 ptSoloQ -1.4

With

Topgap to expected

K'Sante67.7% · expected 52.4% · 62 g+15.3 ptSoloQ -1.1

Sion62.3% · expected 54.2% · 61 g+8.1 ptSoloQ +5.0

Camille64.4% · expected 58.9% · 59 g+5.5 ptSoloQ -1.6

Ambessa58.6% · expected 53.9% · 70 g+4.6 ptSoloQ -0.3

Gnar54.4% · expected 51.1% · 68 g+3.3 ptSoloQ +0.9

Junglegap to expected

Sylas71.1% · expected 58.0% · 38 g+13.1 ptSoloQ -0.9

Xin Zhao59.4% · expected 52.5% · 69 g+6.9 ptSoloQ -1.7

Jarvan IV56.2% · expected 52.9% · 137 g+3.3 ptSoloQ -0.7

Skarner56.3% · expected 50.6% · 48 g+5.7 ptSoloQ +0.2

Sejuani53.7% · expected 48.0% · 41 g+5.7 ptSoloQ -2.5

Midgap to expected

Cassiopeia71.1% · expected 56.0% · 38 g+15.1 ptSoloQ +3.4

Ahri57.8% · expected 53.9% · 128 g+3.9 ptSoloQ +0.6

Locke66.7% · expected 59.0% · 39 g+7.6 ptSoloQ -1.2

Sylas66.7% · expected 58.3% · 33 g+8.4 ptSoloQ -0.6

Viktor54.3% · expected 53.6% · 127 g+0.7 ptSoloQ -0.9

ADCgap to expected

Aphelios66.7% · expected 52.9% · 30 g+13.7 ptSoloQ -0.6

Varus67.6% · expected 57.2% · 37 g+10.3 ptSoloQ -0.9

Yunara59.3% · expected 55.7% · 91 g+3.6 ptSoloQ +2.2

Tristana58.8% · expected 56.5% · 119 g+2.4 ptSoloQ -0.8

Ezreal57.1% · expected 51.4% · 56 g+5.8 ptSoloQ +1.9

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top24 champions