Champion sheet · Mid

LeBlanc

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · EUW

Tournament presence · pick + ban

12.1%#63 of 173 champions

Pick: 4.2%picked in 314 of 7,565 games
Ban: 7.9%286 bans over 3,601 games, against 16.6% in soloQ

Win rate as Mid52.8% between 48.1% and 57.5% over 303 gamesSoloQ 51.1%: no clear gap

Median length28.7 minsoloQ 28 min

Amateur: 7,565 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 385,041 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments2 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.Draft
How to play itElectrocute, then Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, and Rabadon's Deathcap: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compTakes its kills in duels first: more duels than 97% of mid laners.Map pressureDuelistDamageSplit-push
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftFallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

2 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

DraftPicked less often in amateur play
Amateur
1.9%
SoloQ
2.7%
1.9% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 2.7% in soloQ.
DraftBanned less often in amateur play
Amateur
8.2%
SoloQ
16.6%
8.2% ban rate in amateur play over 2,305 games, against 16.6% in soloQ over 183,139 games.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Electrocute, then Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, and Rabadon's Deathcap: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesElectrocute98% · 20,093

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Ignite91% · 18,555

Same in amateur play

SkillsWnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 94% · 74 games

Core (3 legendaries)23% · 2,220

23%of soloQ games

Luden's Echo
Shadowflame
Rabadon's Deathcap

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Takes its kills in duels first: more duels than 97% of mid laners.

Takes its kills in duelstop3%30% · mid laners: 23%
Team damagetop10%25% · mid laners: 21%
Map pressuretop12%4.6 · mid laners: 3.2

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

Map pressure
Duelist
Damage
Split-push

Like other mid laners

Damage in mid game
Damage in late game
Crowd control (CC)

What it is not

Few teamfights
No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 86 in lane, 68 in mid game and 55 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

593+66 vs 528

955+55 vs 899

1,195+16 vs 1,179

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

LeBlancmid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 76% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners

4.6takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 86 of 100 among mid laners593 · median 528
Damage in mid game · rank 68 of 100 among mid laners955 · median 899
Damage in late game · rank 55 of 100 among mid laners1,195 · median 1,179
Gold at 15 min · rank 82 of 100 among mid laners+296 · median +25
Gold at 20 min · rank 76 of 100 among mid laners+380 · median +71
Map pressure · rank 88 of 100 among mid laners4.6 · median 3.2
Absorbs damage · rank 19 of 100 among mid laners342 · median 489
Plays teamfights · rank 1 of 100 among mid laners48% · median 55%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 97 of 100 among mid laners30% · median 23%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 22 of 100 among mid lanersrank 22 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 38 of 100 among mid laners0.6 · median 0.7
Team damage · rank 90 of 100 among mid laners25% · median 21%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Wukong56.8% · expected 52.8% · 37 g+4.0 ptSoloQ +0.2

Jarvan IV53.5% · expected 53.4% · 43 g+0.1 ptSoloQ +1.3

Midgap to expected

Orianna59.0% · expected 51.3% · 39 g+7.7 ptSoloQ -2.2

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

Lulu56.3% · expected 54.9% · 32 g+1.3 ptSoloQ +1.8

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Wukong64.5% · expected 52.8% · 31 g+11.7 ptSoloQ +2.0

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

Nautilus67.7% · expected 56.0% · 31 g+11.7 ptSoloQ +1.3

Lulu51.5% · expected 50.7% · 33 g+0.8 ptSoloQ -0.6

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top16 champions